✦ Allahabad High Court

APPLICATION No. - 32663 of 2025 Mohd. Ali State of U.P v. State of U.P & Anr.

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 32663 of 2025KRISHAN PAHAL2 min read

Case at a glance

Bench
KRISHAN PAHAL

Outcome

Bail granted

The bail application is allowed on the ground of parity

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 77. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, pending trial and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant has made…

Judgment

2.

Heard Sri Irshad Ahmad, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri R.P. Patel, learned State Law Officer for the State and perused the material placed on record.

3.

Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.336 of 2024, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 221, 132, 121(1), 121(2), 109(1), 125, 223B B.N.S., 2023 and Section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932, Police Station Kotwali Sambhal, District Sambhal, during the pendency of trial.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that similarly placed co-accused person Fardeen has already been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 6.8.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.24674 of 2025, as such, since the role of the applicant is identical to that of co-accused, who has already been enlarged on bail, he is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. There is no previous criminal history of the applicant. He is languishing in jail since

16.01.2025. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

5.

The prayer for bail has been vehemently opposed by learned State Law Officer. However, the aforesaid factual aspect of the parity to the co-accused has not been disputed by him. 2 BAIL No. 32663 of 2025

6.

The Supreme Court in Prabhakar Tewari vs. State of U.P. And Another, (2020) 11 SCC 648 has observed that pendency of several criminal cases against an accused itself cannot be a basis for refusal of bail, if otherwise his case for bail is made out.

Operative part

7.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, pending trial and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for grant of bail on the ground of parity. The bail application is allowed on the ground of parity.

8.

Let the applicant- Mohd. Ali, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence during trial. (ii) The applicant shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed.

9.

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

10.

It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. September 23, 2025 (Ravi Kant) (Krishan Pahal,J.) RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The bail application is allowed on the ground of parity

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 109(1), 121(1), 121(2), 125, 132, 190, 191(2), 191(3), 221, 223B; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932 — s. 7.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 32663 of 2025). ← Search more judgments