Rajaram v. Pandey
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL
Outcome
Disposed of
With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
Judgment
It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that partition suit filed under Section 176 of U.P. Z.A. and L.R. Act, 1950 is pending consideration before respondent no. 2 since 2015. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the same.
As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon respondent no. 2 to decide the Suit No.9012 of 2015, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Operative part
With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 24, 2025 V.S.Singh (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 — s. 176; U.P. Z.A. and L.R. Act, 1950 — s. 176.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.