✦ Allahabad High Court

Shri Abhijeet Mitra v. Singh (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)

CIVIL) No. 2399 of 2026ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL

Case at a glance

Bench
ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. At this stage, without entering into merit of case, this writ petition is disposed of with an observation that an opportunity is granted to petitioner to place his case on facts as well as on law before concerned respondent and if concerned respondent is…

Judgment

Shri Abhijeet Mitra Versus .....Applicant(s) .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sarthak Ahuja, Saurabh Tripathi, Sr. Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Advocate Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

1.

The writ Court on 03.11.2025 while disposing of Writ-A No. 11718 of 2025 passed the following order:- "1. Heard Sri Prabhakar Awasthi, learned counsel for petitioner and S/Sri A.K. Singh and Uday Pratap Singh, learned counsel for respondents at length.

2.

At this stage, without entering into merit of case, this writ petition is disposed of with an observation that an opportunity is granted to petitioner to place his case on facts as well as on law before concerned respondent and if concerned respondent is satisfied, impugned order may be revisited.

3.

Aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of 3 months. "

2. Today, a compliance affidavit has been filed on behalf of the opposite party, which is taken on record, wherein, it has been stated that the claim of the applicant has been decided on 29.04.2026, copy of which has been appended as Annexure No. 1 to the compliance affidavit.

3. In view of said fact, as the order of writ Court has been complied with, the present contempt application is rendered infructuous and stands dismissed. May 6, 2026 A. V. Singh (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CIVIL) No. 2399 of 2026). ← Search more judgments