Satyapal @ Satyaram v. State Of U.P. And 16 Others
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the respondent
Provisions considered
- U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 ss. 198(4), 333
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. The present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the aforementioned appeal, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of…
Judgment
#1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
#2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No.2 the Additional Commissioner (Judicial) First, Kanpur Division Kanpur to decide the Stay Application filed in appeal as well as appeal having Case No. 289 of 2024, Computerize Case No. C202403000000289 (Jagdish Singh and others Vs. Land Management Committee and others) under section 333 of U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, expeditiously with in stipulated period.. b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to not dispossess the petitioner from the land in question i.e. allotted land in pursuant to order dated 15.02.2021 passed by Additional District Magistrate (Judicial), Auraiya in Case No. 00084 of 2021, Computerize Case No. D202103050000084 (State Government Vs. Abbal Singh) under section 198(4) of U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, till the disposal of appeal pending in the court of Additional Commissioner (Judicial) First, Kanpur Division Kanpur."
#3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the aforementioned appeal is pending before respondent no.2 for adjudication. He prayed that the same may be decided expeditiously.
#4. No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
#5. The present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the aforementioned appeal, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the respondents and after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 30.5.2025 S. Singh SAVITA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Manish Kumar Nigam, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the respondent
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 — ss. 198(4), 333.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 30 May 2025. The bench was MANISH KUMAR NIGAM.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.