Smt. Vidhi Khandelwal v. State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Applicant :- Smt. Vidhi Khandelwal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Kumar Singh, Sohan Lal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. This application under Section 482 CrPC has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to direct the learned Civil Judge (F.T.C.) (Crime Against Women) Meerut to decide the Case No. 593 of 2021 (Vidhi Khandelwal Vs. Rishabh Jain), under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Police Station Nauchandi, District Meerut within stipulated period. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that in the present case, applicant is the wife of opposite party no.2 and has filed an application under Section 12 of Domestic Violence Act on 3.08.2021 and since then, proceedings has not yet been concluded and the same has been lingering-on, on one pretext or the other. In view of the above, learned court below is expected to make all endeavours to decide the aforesaid case as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of filing of certified copy of this order without giving any unnecessary adjournments to either parties, if there is no other legal impediment in deciding the aforesaid case. With the aforesaid direction, this application under Section 482 CrPC is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 14.11.2022 SFH HUSAIN Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 — s. 12.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 14 Nov 2022.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.