Praveen Kumar v. Shukla

Even though, the names of Mr. Devendra Kumar Shukla and Mr. Pramod Shukla are duly published in the cause list as counsel for petitioner but neither they nor anyone on their behalf is present before this Court to press this writ petition.

Learned AGA representing State-respondents 1, 2 and 3 and Mr. Kuldeep Kumar, the learned counsel representing first informant- respondent 4- Smt. Jaypati are present.

Present writ petition came up for admission on 20.04.2026 and this Court passed the following order :- "1. Heard Mr. Pramod Shukla, the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned A.G.A. representing State-respondents 1 to 3 and Mr. Kuldeep Kumar, the learned counsel representing first informant/respondent-4. 2 CRLP No. 5411 of 2026

2. Perused the record.

3. Petitioner-Praveen Kumar has approached this Court by means of present Criminal Misc. Writ Petition challenging the FIR dated 31.01.2026 lodged by first informant- respondent-4, Smt. Jaypati and registered as Case Crime No. 0049 of 2026, under Sections 318 (4), 351 (2), 336, 338, 340 (2) BNS, Police Station- Gulawathi, District- Bulandshahar.

4. After some arguments, the leaned counsel for petitioner submits that the hearing of present writ petition be adjourned to enable to petitioner to undertake necessary exercise for repayment of the disputed amount paid by first informant/respondent-4 through R.T.G.S.

In view of bonafide submission urged by the learned counsel for petitioner, we adjourn the hearing of present writ petition.

Matter shall re-appear for admission as fresh on 27.04.2026."

5. As no one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition even in revised call, it is accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.

6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. May 12, 2026 Rama Kant (Padam Narain Mishra,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) RAMA KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad