✦ Allahabad High Court

Smt. Rekha & Anr. v. Pankaj Kumar Yadav

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 9870 of 2026RAJEEV MISRA, PADAM NARAIN MISHRA

Judgment

Smt. Rekha And Another State Of U.P. And 2 Others Versus .....Petitioner(s) .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) Counsel for Respondent(s) Pankaj Kumar Yadav : : G.A. Court No. - 49 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE PADAM NARAIN MISHRA, J.

1.

Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned A.G.A. for State-respondents.

2.

Perused the record.

3.

On the matter being taken up, the learned A.G.A. representing State- respondents submits that he has not received instructions in the matter.

4.

In view of above, the hearing of this writ petition is adjourned.

5.

Matter shall re-appear as fresh before appropriate Bench on

29.05.2026.

6.

Since the hearing of present writ petition has been adjourned only on the aforesaid ground, therefore, as an interim measure, it is hereby provided that petitioner (s) shall not be arrested in Case Crime No. 56 of 2026 arising out of impugned FIR dated 10.04.2026 till the next date fixed. May 1, 2026 Akram (Padam Narain Mishra,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 9870 of 2026). ← Search more judgments