Rameshwar v. State Of U.P. And 5 Others
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the aforesaid application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within eight weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after…
Judgment
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4016 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rameshwar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Munna Tiwari, Shrinivas Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "issue a writ order or direction in nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 to decide the Stay application along with Rivision No. 2353 of 2024 bearing Computer Case No.- C202405000002353 (Rameshwar and others Vs. Rambahaal and others) under section 219 Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901 pending before Commissioner Gorakhpur, Region- Gorakhpur within a stipulated period.."
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the aforesaid stay application is pending consideration and the same has not been decided till date. Learned counsel prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
Since the aforesaid application is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
Operative part
In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the aforesaid application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within eight weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 24.2.2025 Rishabh [Manish Kumar Nigam, J.] RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901 — s. 219.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 24 Feb 2025.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.