Paramhans And 2 Others v. State Of Up And 81 Others
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No.2 - Commissioner Azamgarh Division, Azamgarh to consider and decide the stay application filed…
Judgment
From the perusal of the writ petition and annexures annexed thereto, it appears that the stay application filed in appeal is pending since 2024 and several dates have been fixed by the court concerned, however, till date, the same has not been decided.
No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
Operative part
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No.2 - Commissioner Azamgarh Division, Azamgarh to consider and decide the stay application filed in the appeal, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 25.2.2025/Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) NITIKA SRIVASTAVA NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901 — s. 210.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 25 Feb 2025. The bench was MANISH KUMAR NIGAM.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.