Judgment · High Court · 2003
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
counsel for the applicant and Sri N.P.Shah Brief Holder respondent. From the perusal of the record it is revealed that the arbitrator had remuneration as fixed by him under section 31(8) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 had not been paid. As per the letter sent by the arbitrator in all 17 sittings of the arbitral tribunal were held and, therefore, the parties are directed to pay the arrears of the remuneration in equal share within a period of six weeks. The arbitrator may be informed accordingly. Let the record be consigned. (Irshad Hussain, J.) Dated: 21.11.2003: ISB
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 31(8).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Uttarakhand High Court, on 21 Nov 2003. The bench was IRSHAD HUSSAIN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.