M/s Goodman Drug House Pvt. Ltd v. The Indian Institute of Petroleum
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
M/s Goodman Drug House Pvt. Ltd. KA-44, Kavi Nagar, Ghaziabad, U.P. through its Chairman and Managing Director, Shri V.K. Sharma ………………. Applicant Versus The Indian Institute of Petroleum P.O. IIP, Mohkampur, Haridwar and Dehradun through its Director …………….. Respondent Mr. V.K. Singh, i/b Mr. Arvind Vashisht, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. V.K. Kohli, Advocate for the respondent Coram: Hon. Irshad Hussain, J. Dated: 7.11.2003: PC: This petition was preferred under section 42 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in order to enforce the award. It is not in dispute that application for setting aside the arbitral award under section 34 of the Act had been preferred within time and consequently in view of the provision of section 36 of the Act, arbitral award cannot legally be enforced. Considering this, petition is infructuous and dismissed as such. (Irshad Hussain, J.) Rawat
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 42.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Uttarakhand High Court, on 07 Nov 2003. The bench was IRSHAD HUSSAIN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.