✦ Uttarakhand High Court · 15 Sep 2003

In Writ Petition No.813 (M.B) of 2003 v. Sambhagiya Parivahan Adhikari, Nainital & Ors.

Review Application No. 8768 of 2003

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The Review application is disposed of accordingly

Provisions considered

Judgment

Ms. S.S. Yadav, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner. Sri N.B.Tiwari, for the respondents. Coram: Hon. S.H.Kapadia, C.J. Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J. Dated: 15.09.2003: PC: In view of our order dated 15th September, 2003 in Modification Application No.8897 of 2003 in Writ Petition No. 451 (M.B.) of 2003, we direct the applicant/petitioner to approach the Additional Commissioner of Transport for release of his vehicle. The Additional Commissioner of Transport will decide the matter in accordance with the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and in particular under Section 207(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act,

Operative part

1988. The Review application is disposed of accordingly. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) (S.H. Kapadia, C.J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The Review application is disposed of accordingly

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 207(2).

Which court decided this case, and when?

Uttarakhand High Court, on 15 Sep 2003.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Uttarakhand High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Review Application No. 8768 of 2003). ← Search more judgments