Judgment · High Court · 2007
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 170
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Private Paperbook along with Decree Form shall be filed by the Appellant within a period of one year from today. If compliance is not made within stipulated time, the Appeal shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution without further reference to the court. -2-…
Judgment
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY INININ THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CONTINUNATION SHEET FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET FARAD APPEAL NO.86 OF 2007 FIRST APPEAL NO.86 OF 2007 FIRST APPEAL NO.86 OF 2007 FIRST ............................................................. Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Court’s or Judge’s orders Ms Arti Barve for the Appellant Mr.T.J.Mendon for Respondent No.1 A.S.OKA, J. CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. CORAM: : JANUARY 23,2007. DATE : JANUARY 23,2007. DATEDATE : JANUARY 23,2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.:
A statement has been made in the Memorandum of Appeal that leave under section 170 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 has been granted in favour of the Appellant. Admit. Shri Mendon waives service for Respondent No.1. Printing is dispensed with.
Private Paperbook along with Decree Form shall be filed by the Appellant within a period of one year from today. If compliance is not made within stipulated time, the Appeal shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution without further reference to the court. -2- JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 170.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 23 Jan 2007. The bench was A S OKA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.