✦ Bombay High Court · 23 Jan 2007

Judgment · High Court · 2007

A S OKA

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. Private Paperbook along with Decree Form shall be filed by the Appellant within a period of one year from today. If compliance is not made within stipulated time, the Appeal shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution without further reference to the court. -2-…

Judgment

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY INININ THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CONTINUNATION SHEET FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET FARAD APPEAL NO.86 OF 2007 FIRST APPEAL NO.86 OF 2007 FIRST APPEAL NO.86 OF 2007 FIRST ............................................................. Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Court’s or Judge’s orders Ms Arti Barve for the Appellant Mr.T.J.Mendon for Respondent No.1 A.S.OKA, J. CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. CORAM: : JANUARY 23,2007. DATE : JANUARY 23,2007. DATEDATE : JANUARY 23,2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.:

1.

A statement has been made in the Memorandum of Appeal that leave under section 170 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 has been granted in favour of the Appellant. Admit. Shri Mendon waives service for Respondent No.1. Printing is dispensed with.

2.

Private Paperbook along with Decree Form shall be filed by the Appellant within a period of one year from today. If compliance is not made within stipulated time, the Appeal shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution without further reference to the court. -2- JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 170.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 23 Jan 2007. The bench was A S OKA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments