Judgment · High Court · 2004
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. K.P. Upadhayaya, learned counsel for the State. The present application application under section 11 (5) and (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of the Arbitrator. Mr. S.K. Jain, learned counsel for the applicant, points out is an arbitration clause vide clause no. 3(2). I am satisfied there exists a dispute, for which notice for appointment of Arbitrator has already been sent to the other side. However, inspite of service, the other side has not named any Arbitrator. In that view, as per my power under section 11 (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, I hereby appoint Mr. P.K. Sharma, Retd. Chief Engineer, P.W.D. U.P., R/O 170 Phase II Vasant Vihar, Dehradun as sole Arbitrator in the matter. The arbitrator shall complete the arbitration proceedings within a period of six months. The application is disposed of accordingly. (VSS, C.J.) 04.12.2004
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 11(5).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Uttarakhand High Court, on 04 Dec 2004.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.