✦ Uttarakhand High Court · 19 Aug 2010

Ram Prasad Kala v. Union of India & Ors.

S/S) No. 1196 of 2004SUDHANSHU DHULIA2 min read

Case at a glance

Judgment

Present: Mr. B.S. Negi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.S. Rawal, Advocate for the respondents. Date of Order : 19.8.2010 Hon(cid:146)ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.(Oral) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondents. The petitioner was enrolled the Army on

11.11.1961 and served in the Indian Army up to 19.6.1969 as a Sepoy at Military Service Corps Prantiya Parivahan ESC (MT). This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to release the disability pension/medical pension to him with interest. All the same, after the promulgation of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, in terms of Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 all such proceedings, inter alia, pending before a High Court, which would have fallen within the jurisdiction of a Tribunal, had such proceeding arisen after the establishment of the Armed Forces Tribunal, are mandatory to stand transferred to the Armed Forces Tribunal on the date on which the Tribunal was constituted. Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 is being reproduced hereunder: (cid:147)34. Transfer of pending cases. (cid:151)(1) Every suit, or other proceeding pending before any court including a High Court or other authority immediately before the date of establishment of the Tribunal under this Act, being a suit or proceeding the cause of action whereon it is based, is such that it would have been within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, if it had arisen after such establishment within the jurisdiction of such Tribunal, stand transferred on that date to such Tribunal.

(2) Where any suit, or other proceeding stands transferred from any court including a High Court or other authority to the Tribunal under sub- section (1),-- (a) the court or other authority shall, as soon as may be, after such transfer, forward the records of such suit, or other proceeding to the Tribunal; the Tribunal may, on receipt of such records, (b) proceed to deal with such suit, or other proceeding, so far as may be, in the same manner as in the case of an application made under sub- section (2) of Section 14, from the stage which was reached before such transfer or from any earlier stage or de novo as the Tribunal may deem fit. (cid:148) This Court, therefore, is satisfied that in terms of Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, the instant writ petition would stand automatically transferred to the Armed Forces Tribunal on the constitution thereof. In view of the above, the Registry is hereby directed to transfer the records of the present case in accordance with Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 to the Armed Forces Tribunal, near Governor House, Rafi Ahmad Kidwai Marg, Lucknow for its disposal. Rathour (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 19.8.2010

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 — s. 34; Constitution of India.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Uttarakhand High Court, on 19 Aug 2010. The bench was SUDHANSHU DHULIA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Uttarakhand High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. S/S) No. 1196 of 2004). ← Search more judgments