S ORDERS CLCON No. 188 of 2026 · Uttarakhand High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr. Sagar Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Lalit Samant, learned counsel for the respondents.
Mr. Lalit Samant, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the order passed by the writ court has been fully complied with.
Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that order has been complied with.
In such view of the matter, since, the order of the writ court has been complied with, the notices issued against respondents under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 are discharged and the proceedings of the instant contempt petition is closed. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
23.04.2026 Shiv/Pant
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.