SL. No Date Office Notes v. District Magistrate & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Bench
- PANKA
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly writ petition is dismissed in limine
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Accordingly writ petition is dismissed in limine. SK (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 20.04.2026
Judgment
Mr. Akshay Pradhan, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. Yogesh Pandey, learned D.A.G. for the State.
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction the respondent no.1-District Magistrate, Haridwar, to decide his application under Section 41 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901.
From perusal of the record, it transpires that no such application under Section 41 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, has been moved by the petitioner before the learned Assistant Collector, Ist Class, Roorkee, Haridwar, who has got exclusive jurisdiction to entertain and decide such application.
In such view of the matter no interference is required by this Court in the matter.
Operative part
Accordingly writ petition is dismissed in limine. SK (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 20.04.2026
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly writ petition is dismissed in limine
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 — s. 41.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.