WPMS No. 865 of 2008 · Uttarakhand High Court
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 23 May 2008
- Bench
- B S VERMA
Outcome
Dismissed
The writ petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
Sri Arvind Vashihst, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri S. Dhulia, Senior Advocate with Ms. Puja Banga, learned counsel for the respondents. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdraw. However, the petitioner may avail alternate remedy as provided under Section 28(A) Sub clause 4 of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973. All applications stands disposed of accordingly. Dated:- 23-05-2008 (B.S. Verma,J) M.K.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Uttarakhand High Court, on 23 May 2008. The bench was B S VERMA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.