Writ Petition (C) v. Bespondent (s)
Judgment
MR. A. K. UPADHYAYA, SENIOR ADVOCATE MR DHURBA TEWARI, MR. ASHIM CHETTRI, MS. BINITA CHETTRI AND MR.THUPDEN G. BHUTIA, ADVOCATHS MR. J. 8. PRADHAN, ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL MR. KARMA THINLAY NAMGYAL,GOVT. ADVOCATE MR. SANTOSH KR. CHETTRI, ASST.GOVT. ADVOCATE Order (s) with Signature (s) 3 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. P. WANGDI ACTING CHIEF JUSTICEMr.A.K,Upadhyaya, learned Senior Advocate, appearing on behalf of the petitioners sought permission to make a mention of a matter of an urgent nature pertaining to a tender process which was also the subject matter in an earlier writ petition being Writ Petition(C) No.20 of 2010, Appellant For Petitioner (Advocate (s)) Plespondent For Opposite Party (Advocate (s)) Serial No. Date 1 2
2.05.2010 SGPG-1/ High Courv 2000 Nos./ 2.4.2009 Serial No. Order (s) with Signature (s) Case No No ` 91| 2rfflo He submits that copies have been served upon the State respondents through the office of the learned Additional Advocate General this morning. Mr. J. 8. Pradhan,- learned Additional Advocate General who is in Court, acknowledges the fact that the copy indeed has been served on him this morning, However, he prays that the matter be listed at 1.00 p.in. in order to enable him to seek necessary instructions from the department concerned. Let the writ petition be registered. Registry is directed to take necessary steps in this regard. List at 1.00 p.m' SGPG. 3/ High Courv 5000 Nos./ 2.4.2009
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.