✦ Rajasthan High Court

Hari Ram v. State Of Rajasthan

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 20367 of 2025MANEESH SHARMA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having

Key paragraphs

  • Para 66. All other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. SOURAV /132 (MANEESH SHARMA),J

Judgment

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, To The Government Department Of Panchayati Raj And Rural Development Government Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, Department Of Panchayati Raj And Rural Development Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

4. The District Collector, Jhunjhunu The Tehsildar, Chirawa Distt. Jhunjhunu. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s)

: Mr. Rajpal Dhankhar For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.D. Gathala, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA 21/01/2026 Order

1.

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that pursuant to notice dated 08.12.2025 (Annexure-9), the encroachment of the petitioner has already been removed. He further submits that at present, the respondents are not taking any action against the petitioner in respect of the land regarding which a Patta has been issued in the petitioner's favour and in case any further action is required for removal of encroachment or otherwise, fresh proceedings will be initiated, and due notices will be given to the petitioner prior to initiating said proceedings. [2026:RJ-JP:2721] (2 of 2) [CW-20367/2025]

2.

In that view of the matter, the relief claimed in the writ petition has rendered infructuous.

Operative part

3.

Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

4.

However, the petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh writ petition, if need so arises.

5.

At the same time, the petitioner is further directed not to re- encroach upon the disputed land under the teeth of this Order.

6.

All other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. SOURAV /132 (MANEESH SHARMA),J

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Rajasthan High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 20367 of 2025). ← Search more judgments