Mayank Kumar Sharma v. State of Rajasthan, Through Deputy Secretary-I, Urban
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Ashu/43 (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
Judgment
1. State of Rajasthan, Through Deputy Secretary-I, Urban Development Department, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Jaipur Greater, Pandit Dindayal Uppadhyay Bhawan, Tonk Road, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Raj) 302015
3. Chief Town Planner, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, J.L.N. Marg, Opposite Birla Mandir, Rambagh, Jaipur (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Manish Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 16/09/2025
Aggrieved by the order dated 01.09.2025, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of filing the instant writ petition.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that without issuing any notice and without following the due process of law as contained under Regulation 9 of the Model Rajasthan (Urban Area) Building Byelaws, 2025, the certificate of the petitioner for working as an Architect has been cancelled. Counsel submits that by doing so, the respondents have violated the principles of natural justice. [2025:RJ-JP:37623] (2 of 2) [CW-14114/2025]
Considering the aforesaid, the instant writ petition stands disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondent authorities and submit appropriate representation against the order impugned within a period of one week from today. It is expected from the respondent authorities to decide the same strictly in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and after following the due process of law as contained under Regulation 9 of the Model Rajasthan (Urban Area) Building Bye-laws, 2025.
Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Ashu/43 (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.