Karuna Nidhi Bakolia v. The State Of Rajasthan
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Versus ----Petitioner The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Law And Legal Affairs Department, Government Secretariat, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. The Judge, Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Jhunjhunu Rajasthan. The Senior Deputy Secretary (Admin), Law And Legal Affairs Department, Government Secretariat, Government Of Rajasthan…
Judgment
Karuna Nidhi Bakolia S/o Shri Babu Lal Bakolia, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ward No. 12, Jyoti Nagar, Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.).
Versus ----Petitioner The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Law And Legal Affairs Department, Government Secretariat, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. The Judge, Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Jhunjhunu Rajasthan. The Senior Deputy Secretary (Admin), Law And Legal Affairs Department, Government Secretariat, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. The Secretary, Department Of Energy, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur Chief Personnel Officer, Rajasthan Rajyva Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd. Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur. Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshit Gupta assisted by Ms. Pragya Seth Mr. Nakul Bansal Mr. Shreyansh Dhariwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sandeep Kumar Sharma, DGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 08/07/2025 Learned counsels for the respective parties submit that the controversy involved herein is no more res integra and stands resolved by a coordinate Bench order of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur dated 07.05.2022 passed in the case of Honey Singh Chouhan versus State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil [2025:RJ-JP:25156] (2 of 2) [CW-6719/2025] Writ Petition No.5781/2018. They, therefore, pray that this writ petition may also be disposed of in similar terms. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. Manish/s-218 (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.