Babloo @ Nishit v. State Of Rajasthan Through P.p., Rajasthan
Judgment
Kamal Singh S/o Shri Ramlal Singh, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Nayasar At Present R/o D-44 Indra Nagar, Jhunjhunu, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajpal Dhankhar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP Mr. Banwari Lal Sharma, Adv. Mr. Namo Narayan Sharma, Adv. Ms. Rudhika Nuwal, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 14/05/2026 ;kph&vfHk;qDr ccyw mQZ fuf"kFk ds lkFk&lkFk vU; vfHk;qDrx.k fcUuw mQZ mEesn flag rFkk jktsUnz mQZ jktw mQZ jktdqekj dks fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; vfrfjDr eq[; U;kf;d eftLVªsV] >qa>quq }kjk fu; fer vkijkf/kd izdj.k la[;k 297@2005 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 06-07-2017 ds ek/;e ls /kkjk 452] 324] 323 rFkk 427 Hkk-na-la- ds vijk/k esa nks"kfl) djkj nsrs gq, vijk/kh ifjoh{kk vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&4 ds izko/kkuksa dk ykHk nsdj lnkpkj dh ifjoh{kk nsdj NksMk rFkk izR;sd vfHkqDr ij nks&nks gtkj :i;s dk vfHk;kstu O;; vf/kjksfir fd;k x;k rFkk ifjoh{kk vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&12 ds izko/kkuksa dk Hkh ykHk fn;k x;kA [2026:RJ-JP:20399] (2 of 3) [CRLR-1449/2018] fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vfHk;qDrx.k dks ifjoh{kk dk ykHk fn;s tkus ls O;fFkr gksdj dkjkokl ds n.M ls nafMr fd;s tkus gsrq ifjoknh@v;kph dey flag }kjk fo}ku ls'ku U;k;ky;] >qaa>quq ds le{k nkafMd vihy la[;k 105@2017 izLrqr dh] ftls ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 29- 05-2018 ds ek/;e ls Lohdkj djrs gq, vfHk;qDrx.k dks fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk fn;s x;s ifjoh{kk ds ykHk ds laca/k esa fn;s x;s vkns'k dks vikLr dj n.M ds fcUnq ij iqu% lqus tkus dk vkns'k fn;k x;k] ftlls O;fFkr gksdj ;kph&vfHk;qDr }kjk ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk is'k dh x;h gSA ifjoknh dey flag ds vykok jkT; ljdkj vFkok vU; fdlh O;fDr }kjk dksbZ vihy izLrqr ugha dh x;h] vr% Li"V gS fd fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vkns'k ls ek= ifjoknh@vkgr dey flag gh O;fFkr FkkA vkt ifjoknh@v;kph dey flag }kjk vius vf/koDrk ds lkFk O;fDr'k% mifLFkr gksdj jkthukek@le>kSrk&i= izLrqr djrs gq, fuosnu fd;k fd mlds }kjk vfHk;qDrx.k dks ifjoh{kk dk ykHk fn;s tkus ls O;fFkr gksdj fo}ku ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] >qa>quq ds le{k vihy izLrqr dh Fkh] ysfdu ?kVuk djhc 29 o"kZ iqjkuh gS rFkk i{kdkjku ds chp jkthukek gksdj lkSgknZiw.kZ laca/k LFkkfir gks pqds gSa] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vfHk;qDrx.k dks tks ifjoh{kk dk ykHk fn;k x;k Fkk] mlls vc O;fFkr ugha gS rFkk jkthukek ds vk/kkj ij lHkh vfHk;qDrx.k ds laca/k esa ikfjr vihyk/khu fu.kZ; fnukad 29-05-2018 dks vikLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd; kA vijk/k dh izd`fr rFkk ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d fu.kZ; Gian Singh Vs.
State of Punjab & Anr. 2012(10) SCC 303 esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj or Zeku ekeys eas bl U;k;ky; }kjk /kkjk 482 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk@528 ch-,u-,l-,l- dh 'kfDr;ksa dk iz; ksx fd;k tkuk mfpr gksxkA pwafd vc ifjoknh dks fdlh Hkh vfHk;qDr dks ifjoh{kk dk ykHk fn;s ij dksbZ O;Fkk ugha gS] jkthukek Hkh is'k gks pqdk gS rFkk jkT; vFkok vU; [2026:RJ-JP:20399] (3 of 3) [CRLR-1449/2018] fdlh O;fDr dh vksj ls dksbZ vihy is'k ugha gqbZ gSA fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk mfpr vkns'k ikfjr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd; kA vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa lEiw.kZ ifjfLFkfr; ksa dks ns[krs gq, fo}ku ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] >qa>quq }kjk nkafMd vihy la[;k 105@2017 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 29-05-2018 dks lHkh vfHk;qDrx.k ccyw mQZ fuf"kFk] fcUuw mQZ mEesn flag rFkk jktsUnz mQZ jktw mQZ jktdqekj ds laca/k esa vikLr fd;k tkrk gS] ifj.kkeLo:i fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; dk fu.kZ; fnukad 06-07-2017 izHkko esa jgsxkA blh vuqlkj ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk Lohdkj dj fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gS] vU; yafcr vkosnu Hkh blh vuqlkj fuLrkfjr ekus tkrs gSaA Mittal /82 (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.