✦ Rajasthan High Court

Dinesh Kumar Meena v. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p

PETITION) No. 352 of 2026UMA SHANKER VYAS2 min read

Judgment

2.

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. Victim, R/o ----Petitioner ----Respondents For Petitioner(s)

: Mr. Ashish Gausinga, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 02/04/2026 ;kph@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) ls'ku izdj.k la[;k 123@2024 jkT; cuke fnus'k dqekj vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 450] 376 ¼2½¼,e½ o 504 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk U;k;ky; vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] dze&2] cwanh esa yafcr gS ftlesa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 09-04-2025 ls O;fFkr gksdj ;g ;kfpdk vUrxZr /kkjk 528 ch ,u ,l ,l ds rgr izLrqr dh x;h gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph@vfHk;qDr dk fuosnu gS fd vuqla/kku ds nkSjku vfHk;qDr i{k }kjk vius cpko ls lacaf/kr nLrkost iqfyl dks izLrqr djuk pkgk] ysfdu muds }kjk Lohdkj ugha fd;s x;s] ftl ij jftLVMZ Mkd ls Hksts x;s] ysfdu muds nLrkostksa dks vkjksi i= dk Hkkx ugha cuk;k x;k] U;k;ky; ds ek/;e ls mudh izfr; ka fnyk;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;k] iajrq os izfr; ka Hkh miyC/k ugha djok;h x;h vkSj bl dkj.k vfHk;qDr viuk cpko mfpr :i ls ugha dj ldrk gSA [2026:RJ-JP:13818] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-352/2026] fnukad 09-04-2025 ds vkns'k dks rF;ksa o fof/k ds foijhr gksuk crkrs gq, vikLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd; kA fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dk fuosnu gS fd ,sls dksbZ nLrkost dsl Mk;jh esa miyC/k ugha Fks] vr% U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkns'k rF;ksa o fof/k ds vuq:i gS] vr% ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh tkosA vfHk;qDr i{k }kjk nLrkostksa dh izfr; ka miyC/k djkus ds laca/k esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa vkosnu is'k fd;k ftl ij fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk rF;kRed fjiksVZ o dsl Mk;jh ryc dh x;h] ysfdu ,sls dksbZ nLrkost tks dfFkr :i ls vfHk;qDr }kjk vuqla/kku ds nkSjku is'k fd;s x;s Fks] dsl Mk;jh esa miyC/k ugha gksus ls mudh izfr; ka miyC/k ugha djok;h x;h gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa vk{ksfir vkns'k iw.kZr% rF;ksa o fof/k ds vuq:i gS rFkk mlesa gLr{ksi fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA mijksDr ifjfLFkfr; ksa ds ckotwn ;g Li"V fd;k tkrk gS fd vfHk;qDr vius cpko ls lacaf/kr nLrkost fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa izLrqr dj ldrk gS rFkk ml fLFkfr esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk mudh xzkg~;rk vkfn ds laca/k esa vius foosdkuqlkj fu.kZ; ikfjr dj ldsxkA blh fVIi.kh ds lkFk ;g ;kfpdk fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gSA LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Hkh blh vuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA vkns'k dh ,d izfr fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks izsf"kr dh tkosA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J Murari Lal Sharma /24

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Rajasthan High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. PETITION) No. 352 of 2026). ← Search more judgments