CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS BAIL APPLICATION No. 8131 of 2026 · Rajasthan High Court

: Mr. J.R. Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.) 04/06/2026 Order

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.84/2026 registered at Police Station Mangaliawas, District Ajmer for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 303(2), 61(2), 316(2), 329(3), 120(2) and 318(4) of BNS and Sections 4 and 21 of Mines and Minerals Development and Regulation Act, 1957.

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long. He further submits that recovery has already been effected; that he has deposited an amount of Rs.5,28,800/- with the Supdt. Mining Engineer Mines and Geo. Deptt. Ajmer and in support of his submission, he has submitted a copy of E-challan which is taken on record; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful [2026:RJ-JP:22965] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8131/2026] purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove and submits that there are two other criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner.

Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments advanced by learned counsels for both the parties; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since

03.05.2026; that the recovery has already been effected; that he has deposited an amount of Rs.5,28,800/- with the Supdt. Mining Engineer Mines and Geo. Deptt. Ajmer; that the accused- petitioner is not required for further investigation; that the trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Damodar Yadav Urf Bablu S/o Shri Kailash Chand Yadav is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. [2026:RJ-JP:22965] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8131/2026]

In case of any breach of the aforementioned condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.

The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. 116/PRAGATI (SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.)),J