Farzana v. Nasir Khan & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 21 Nov 2011
- Bench
- GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS
Outcome
Dismissed
Hence, this writ petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Judgment
Operative part
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. Harish Purohit for the petitioner. BY THE COURT : In this writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging order dated 14.10.2011 which is passed upon application filed under Section 151, C.P.C. for consolidation of two suits pending the Court of Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Nagaur filed by respondent No.1 which was registered as Original Civil Suit No.19/2002 and Suit No.11/2002, pending in the Court of Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.)-cum-Addl. Chief Judl. Magistrate, Nagaur. After perusing the order impugned, I am of the opinion that the application under Section 151, C.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner at the time of final stage of trial of the suit filed by the respondent being Suit No.19/2002, therefore, the trial Court rejected the said application. In my opinion, no case is made 2 out for interference in the order impugned. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed. (Gopal Krishan Vyas) J. Ojha, a.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, this writ petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Rajasthan High Court, on 21 Nov 2011. The bench was GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.