Judgment · High Court · 2006
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
HON'BLE MR.SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. M.K. Garg for the applicant. Mr. Vishnu Kachhawaha, Public Prosecutor. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the impugned order. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the present case, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that applicant Bhiva Ram S/o Ramu Ram shall be released on bail in FIR No.164/2005 P.S. Kuchaman City, District Nagaur, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two 2 sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J. vijayant
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Rajasthan High Court, on 06 Nov 2006. The bench was BLE SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.