Judgment · High Court · 2006

HON'BLE MR. SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. D.S. Udawat for applicants. Mr. V.R. Mehta, Public Prosecutor for the State. Both these matter under Section 439 Cr.P.C. have been filed against FIR No.104/2006 Police Station Falna, District Pali. Since, both the applications, arise out of same FIR, they are being disposed of by this common order. I have heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the impugned order. The contention of learned counsel for the applicants is that the applicants have been held responsible for the offence under Section 419 IPC. He submits that no investigation is to be made from the applicants and they are in jail since long. In last, he prays that the applicants may be enlarged on bail. 2 On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the present case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused applicants on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that the applicants Shivraj Singh son of Himmat Singh and Lalit son of Ghanshyam son of shall be released on bail in FIR No.104/2006 P.S. Falna, District Pali, provided each of them executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J. vijayant