Gulab Singh Ranawat v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of it the writ petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 s. 12(5)
Judgment
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. N.K.Jain, for the petitioner. .... The appropriate government while exercising powers under Section 12(5) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 1947”) by its order dated 9.9.2005 refused to refer the dispute raised by the petitioner for its adjudication to Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal. The contention of counsel for the petitioner is that the appropriate government refused to make reference by entering into merits of the case and that is not permissible under the Act of 1947. Heard counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner in the instant matter want adjudication of a dispute pertaining to his termination from service in the office of Tehsildar, Bhilwara. This Court in the case of Kishan Das Bairagi v. Industrial Tribunal-Labour-Court, Udaipur & Ors., SBCivil Writ Petition No.3563/2006, decided on 2
Operative part
22.8.2006, has already taken the view that the office of the Tehsildar is not an industry and, therefore, in any case the dispute raised by the petitioner is not competent to be adjudicated under the Act of 1947. In view of it the writ petition is dismissed. ( GOVIND MATHUR ),J. kkm/ps.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of it the writ petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — s. 12(5).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Rajasthan High Court, on 22 Aug 2006. The bench was GOVIND MATHUR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.