Santosh Munet v. State of Rajasthan) Date of Order & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
the instant writ petition is allowed in terms of the order of
Judgment
Operative part
O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 2994/2007 (Santosh Munet Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) Date of Order : 18/05/2007 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. Mukesh Rajpurohit for the petitioner. Mr. Rameshwar Dave, Dy. G.A. for the respondents. BY THE COURT:- Issue notice for final disposal. Learned Deputy Government Advocate is directed to accept notice on behalf of respondents. He accepts notice. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is finally heard and decided at the admission stage. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the controversy involved in the instant writ petition stands concluded by a decision of Division Bench of this Court in Prashant Vohra and Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. 2005 (1) Western Law Cases (Raj) 264. In view of the statement of counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is allowed in terms of the order of Division Bench of this Court in Prashant Vohra and Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) and it is directed that the 2 petitioner shall be given notional benefit of the pay scale of Rs.3200-85-4900 from the date of his initial appointment till
1.6.2002 and thereafter, actual benefit of the regular pay scale and his salary shall be fixed afresh within a period of three months. No order as to costs. (H.R.PANWAR),J.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: the instant writ petition is allowed in terms of the order of
Which court decided this case, and when?
Rajasthan High Court, on 18 May 2007. The bench was H R PANWAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.