✦ Rajasthan High Court · 19 Jul 2007

SMT.RUKMA DEVI v. U.I.T.UDAIPUR & Ors.

Misc Application No. 30 of 2007N P GUPTA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

Accordingly, the application is allowed

Judgment

Cause title

SMT.RUKMA DEVI

V/S

U.I.T.UDAIPUR & ORS. Mr. MANOJ JOSHI, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 19.7.2007 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J.

ORDER -----

Operative part

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. It appears that the name of learned counsel accidentally happened to be omitted in the judgment while from the record of the Court including cause list of that day, it is clear that that day Mr. Joshi did appear for the petitioner. Accordingly, the application is allowed. His name may be added in the judgment. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /Sushil/

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the application is allowed

Which court decided this case, and when?

Rajasthan High Court, on 19 Jul 2007. The bench was N P GUPTA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Rajasthan High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Misc Application No. 30 of 2007). ← Search more judgments