Ram Niwas v. Govind Ram alias Govind Prasad
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
therefore, this appeal is dismissed in default for
Judgment
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHAN KUMAR ACHARYA Mr.Rajendra Mehta, for the appellant. Mr.R.R.Nagori, for the respondent. Learned counsel for the respondent states that sole appellant-Ram Niwas expired 3-4 years back and no steps have been taken for bringing the legal representatives of deceased on record, therefore, this appeal has been abated. Learned counsel for the appellant states that he has no instruction in this case. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, since, learned counsel for the appellant has no instruction in this case as also the sole appellant has expired and no steps have been taken for bringing the legal representatives of deceased on record, therefore, this appeal is dismissed in default for want of prosecution as well as abated. NK (KRISHAN KUMAR ACHARYA), J.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: therefore, this appeal is dismissed in default for
Which court decided this case, and when?
Rajasthan High Court, on 24 May 2006. The bench was KRISHAN KUMAR ACHARYA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.