SACHIN & Ors. v. STATE OF HARYANA & Ors.

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Sushil Sheoran, Mr. Sushil Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioners. for the petitioners. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Vikrant Rana, Advocate Mr. Vikrant Rana, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 5. for respondent Nos.2 to 5. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL)

1. Bharatiya Nagarik This is a petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik This is a petition filed under Section This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 FIR No.221, dated for quashing of FIR No.221, dated Bharatiya Nyaya 06.07.2025, under Sections 190, 191(2), 326(G), 333 Bharatiya Nyaya 06.07.2025, under Sections 190, 191(2), 326(G), 333 06.07.2025, under Sections 190, 191(2), 326(G), 333 1) and , registered at PS Tosham, District Bhiwani, (Annexure P-1) and , registered at PS Tosham, District Bhiwani, (Ann Sanhita, 2023, registered at PS Tosham, District Bhiwani, (Ann compromise dated subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of

12.11.2025 (Annexure P-2). 12.11.2025 (Annexure P

2. This Court vide orders dated 07.04.2026 and 30.04.2026 This 07.04.2026 and 30.04.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get the directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get the statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. qua the genuineness of the compromise. GURPREET 2026.05.19 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-71794 71794-2025 2

3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Special Court under Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Special Court Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Special Court and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the POCSO Act, Bhiwani and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the POCSO Act, Bhiwani statements so recorded, learned Sessions Judge statements so recorded, has submitted report dated learned Sessions Judge has submitted report dated to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the 13.05.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. parties voluntarily and wi As per thout any coercion or undue influence. As per photocopy of receipt filed by counsel for the petitioner, previous cost has photocopy of receipt filed by counsel for the petitioner, previous cost has photocopy of receipt filed by counsel for the petitioner, previous cost has photocopy of receipt filed by counsel for the petitioner, previous cost has been deposited. been deposited.

4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 to Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. have not disputed the factum of compromise betwe 5 have not disputed the factum of compromise betwe

5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR.

6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment thers Versus State of Punjab and of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and thers Versus State of Punjab and of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court