Cwp No. 32511 of 2025 · Punjab And Haryana High Court · 2025
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
appeal is available to the petitioner, this petition is hereby disposed of
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. In view of the above said fact that efficacious remedy of third appeal is available to the petitioner, this petition is hereby disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternate remedy of filing third appeal before the Committee in terms of…
Judgment
Present: - Mr.H.S. Saini, for the petitioner. **** DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA, J. (ORAL)
In the present writ petition, petitioner has challenged the order dated 12.06.2025 (Annexure P13) passed by respondent No.3 whereby, the claim of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Anganwadi Worker of Village Panje Ke Hitthar, Center No.1, has been rejected. Petitioner has also challenged the orders passed in the First Appeal filed by the petitioner dated 24/25.06.2025 (Annexure P14) and Second Appeal dated 17.09.2025 (Annexure P17).
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the appellate authorities have not taken into consideration the contention raised by the petitioner in the appeal. Therefore, the impugned orders are liable to be set aside.
Notice of motion. Mr.Surya Kumar, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondents-State and on instructions from Karan Brar, CDPO, Guruhar VIVEK PAHWA 2025.11.12 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CWP-32511-2025 (cid:1) (cid:1) Sahai, submits that as per the impugned order dated 17.09.2025 (Annexure P17) petitioner has an alternate efficacious remedy available of filing third appeal before the Committee and as such, the present writ petition cannot be entertained.
A perusal of the impugned order 17.09.2025 (Annexure P17) would show that the there is a remedy of third appeal available to the petitioner.
Operative part
In view of the above said fact that efficacious remedy of third appeal is available to the petitioner, this petition is hereby disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternate remedy of filing third appeal before the Committee in terms of the impugned order dated
17.09.2025 (Annexure P17). If such an appeal is preferred, the respondents are directed to decide the same within a period of one month from the date of filing of such appeal.
11.11.2025 (cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:1) (cid:1) (DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes No Whether reportable? (cid:1) VIVEK PAHWA 2025.11.12 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: appeal is available to the petitioner, this petition is hereby disposed of
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 11 Nov 2025. The bench was DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.