Ajay & Anr. v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 23 Sep 2025
- Bench
- AMAN CHAUDHARY
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of their claim, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to look into the representation dated
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) *****
The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent Nos.1 to 3 to protect life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents, as they have attained majority and married against the wishes of their family members.
Learned counsel states that the petitioners will be satisfied if the Superintendent of Police, Jind i.e. respondent No.2 is directed to look into the representation dated 21.09.2025 (Annexure P-5), made to him by them and take appropriate action on the same.
As per the averments made, both the petitioners are major and their dates of birth are 12.12.2001 and 03.05.2006, respectively. The copies of their Aadhar cards are appended as Annexures P-1 and P-2, respectively. They got married on 21.09.2025 and the Marriage Certificate and photographs are enclosed with the petition as Annexures P-3 and P-4 respectively.
Notice of motion. MOHIT 2025.09.23 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-10358-2025 (O&M) -2-
At the asking of the Court, (cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:3)(cid:6)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:2)(cid:8)(cid:9)(cid:7)(cid:10)(cid:4)(cid:11)(cid:12)(cid:13)(cid:4)(cid:14)(cid:7)(cid:2)(cid:15)(cid:7)(cid:16)(cid:7)(cid:4) accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 and has no objection in deciding the representation filed on behalf of the petitioners.
In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of their claim, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to look into the representation dated
21.09.2025 (Annexure P-5) and decide the same expeditiously, in accordance with law.
It is however, made clear that this order shall not preclude the authorities to proceed against the petitioners, in case, they are found involved in any other criminal proceedings, instituted/pending against them if there is some evidence that surfaces regarding their involvement in a cognizable offence, for which they may be required by the investigating agency. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
23.09.2025 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable : : Yes / No Yes / No MOHIT 2025.09.23 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 23 Sep 2025. The bench was AMAN CHAUDHARY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.