Yatish Kumar Goel v. State of Haryana & Anr.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 389, 420, 468, 471
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present : Mr. Sudhir Rana, Advocate for the petitioner ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) ***** t petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No.564 of 2015, dated 28.12.2015, registered under Sections 389, 420, 468, 471 of Indian Penal Code and Section 66(B) of IT Act, at Police Station Udyog Vihar, District Gurugram MOHIT 2025.12.09 17:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-58537-2025 (O&M) -2- MOHIT 2025.12.09 17:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-58537-2025 (O&M) -3- 2015, dated 28.12.2015, registered under Sections 389, 420, 468, 471 of Indian Penal Code and Section 66(B) of IT Act, at Police Station Udyog Vihar, District lowed and FIR No.564 of Gurugram
09.12.2025 M.Kamra (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable : : Yes / No Yes / No MOHIT 2025.12.09 17:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 389, 420, 468, 471.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 09 Dec 2025. The bench was AMAN CHAUDHARY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.