Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH ESH MANUJA Mr. S.K. Malik, Advocate Present: Mr. for the petitioner. for th Mr. Arun Beniwal, Sr. D.A.G., Harya Mr. A , Haryana. HARKESH MAN **** MANUJA, J. (Oral)
#1. By way of present petition filed By w filed under Sections 11 & 12 of th of the Contempt of Cou f Courts Act, 1971, read with Article rticle 215 of the Constitution of Indi f India, contempt proceed roceedings are sought to be initiated itiated against the respondents toward towards alleged willful no non-compliance of order dated 11
11.01.2023 passed by this Court Court in CWP No.481 of 2 81 of 2023.
#2. Learned State counsel representing Lear nting the respondents submits that that the petitioner has bee as been granted promotion as a TGT a TGT Sanskrit w.e.f. 08.08.2018 vid 18 vide order dated 11.03
11.03.2024/15.03.2024.
#3. In such circumstances, learned cou In su ed counsel for the petitioner does n oes not press the present p esent petition.
#5. Dismissed as not pressed. Dism Rule stands discharged. Rule September 13, 2 Atik , 2024 (HARKESH MANUJA) (HA JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Whe Whether reportable Whe Yes/No Yes/N Yes/No Yes/N MOHMED ATIK 2024.09.13 19:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.