GGARWAL & Ors. v. PPAL IAS & Anr.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH ESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Mr. Umesh Aggarwal, Advocate for for the petitioners. Mr. Vishnav Gandhi, D.A.G., Punjab Mr. V Punjab. Mr. Sanjeev Soni, Advocate for respo Mr. S r respondent No.2. HARKESH MAN **** MANUJA, J. (Oral)
By way of present petition filed By w filed under Sections 10 & 12 of th of the Contempt of Cou f Courts Act, 1971, read with Article rticle 215 of the Constitution of Indi f India, contempt proceed roceedings are sought to be initiated itiated against the respondents toward towards alleged willful no non-compliance of order dated 29
29.11.2023 passed by this Court Court in CWP No.26087 o 6087 of 2023.
Compliance report by way of aff Com of affidavit of Sh. Ankurjeet Sing Singh, Commissioner, M ner, Municipal Corporation, Pathanko thankot, filed on behalf of responde pondent No.2, in the Regis Registry, is taken on record.
Learned counsel representing respon Lear respondent No.2 submits that the ord he order qua which the contempt proceedings have bee e been sought, stands complied wit with, thereby rendering dering the present petition as infructuo ructuous.
In view of the above, learned counse In vi ounsel for the petitioners does not pre the present petitio petition.
Dismissed as not pressed. Dism Rule stands discharged. Rule September 24, 2 Atik , 2024 (HARKESH MANUJA) (HA JUDGE Whe Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable Whe Yes/N Yes/No Yes/No Yes/N MOHMED ATIK 2024.09.24 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.