DE M No. 36164 of 2024 · Punjab & Haryana High Court
Judgment
Mr. Sumit Kalyan, Advocate for Present: Mr. Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advocate Mr. for the petitioner. for t Mr. Mr. Shiva Khurmi, AAG, Punjab for the respondents. for t *** *** (cid:1) MANJARI NEH NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL)
At the outset, learned State counsel, At th I Vijay unsel, on instructions from ASI Vijay Kumar, has subm s submitted that the instant petition ha ous, as tion has been rendered infructuous, as it had been filed filed to seek directions for a fair and It has air and impartial investigation. It has been further subm r submitted that now the prosecution e ution evidence is underway.
In the aforesaid circumstances, no g In th suance s, no ground is made out for issuance of directions as p ns as prayed for.
Dismissed as having been rendered i Dism dered infructuous. (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL AUL) JUDGE January 10, 202 Pankaj* 0, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable : : Yes/No Yes/No PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.01.13 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.