IN T v. State of Haryana
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
resent petition is disposed of with
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. In view of the above, the presen In v resent petition is disposed of with directions to resp o respondent No.2-Superintendent of ent of Police, Jind, District Jind to look into the repre representation/complaint dated 27.06 d 27.06.2024 (Annexure P-6) qua the alleged threat…
Judgment
Present: Mr. Mr. Gursewak Singh, Advocate for th e for the petitioners. *** MANJARI NEH NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL)
Prayer in the instant petition filed Praye f the filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of In n of India, is for issuance of directions 3 to ections to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life an life and liberty of the petitioners, who r life s, who apprehend threat to their life at the hands of p s of private respondents No.4 to 6, to 6, who are stated to be family members of petiti f petitioner No.1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners Lear o.1, ioners submits that petitioner No.1, aged about 25 ye years and petitioner No.2, aged a d on aged about 36 years, got married on
27.06.2024 again against the wishes of respondents N , the ents No.4 to 6. Ever since then, the petitioners are b are being threatened with dire c dire consequences by the private respondents. Re s. Resultantly, a representation/c 2024 /complaint dated 27.06.2024 (Annexure P-6) 6) was also made to respondent N lice, dent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Jind, District Jind ct Jind wherein a mention has been been made about the alleged threat perception. Lea Learned counsel submits that des at despite the official respondents having been comm n communicated about the alleged thre d threat perception, no steps have PUSHPINDER SAINI 2024.07.02 07:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-6158-202 2024 -2- been taken to com to come to the rescue of the petition etitioners. Learned counsel submits that he would b ould be satisfied if directions are - s are issued to respondent No.2- Superintendent ent of Police, Jind, District J rict Jind representation/com /complaint dated 27.06.2024 (Anne (Annexure P-6) and take appropriate steps at the earlies earliest.
Notice of motion. Notic On asking of the Court, Mr. Rahul M On a ahul Mohan, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf o ehalf of the official respondents.
Operative part
In view of the above, the presen In v resent petition is disposed of with directions to resp o respondent No.2-Superintendent of ent of Police, Jind, District Jind to look into the repre representation/complaint dated 27.06 d 27.06.2024 (Annexure P-6) qua the alleged threat pe eat perception and take necessary s d, in sary steps, as may be required, in accordance with l with law, to ensure that the life and l s not e and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the at the hands of the private respondent ondents. However, this direction will not validate the m the marriage said to have taken plac n place between the parties and will have no effect on fect on any civil or criminal action, w n the tion, which could be initiated in the matter in accordan cordance with law. July 01, 2024 ( (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable : : Yes/No Yes/No PUSHPINDER SAINI 2024.07.02 07:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: resent petition is disposed of with
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.