(O&M) v. ROBIN HANS
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Jasleen Kaur Sidhu, DAG, Punjab. Ms. Jasleen Kaur Sidhu, DAG, Punjab. Ms. Jasleen Kaur Sidhu, DAG, Punjab. HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) HARKESH MANUJA **** present petition filed under Sections 10 and 12 of By way of present petition filed under Sections 10 and 12 of present petition filed under Sections 10 and 12 of By way of the Contempt of Courts Act read with Article 215 of the Constitution of the Contempt of Courts Act read with Article 215 of the Constitution of the Contempt of Courts Act read with Article 215 of the Constitution of the Contempt of Courts Act read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India, prayer has been made for initiation of proceedings against India, prayer has been made for initiation of proceedings against India, prayer has been made for initiation of proceedings against India, prayer has been made for initiation of proceedings against respondent for alleged non-compliance of orders dated 10.04.2023 an respondent for alleged non d compliance of orders dated 10.04.2023 and
19.04.2023 passed by this Court in CRM- 19.04.2023 passed by this Court in CRM - -M-16355-2023 and CRM-M- 2023 respectively. 19171-2023 respectively. Short reply by way of affidavit of Robin Hans, Inspector, Short reply by way of affidavit of Robin Hans, Inspector, Short reply by way of affidavit of Robin Hans, Inspector, Short reply by way of affidavit of Robin Hans, Inspector, Division, Amritsar now posted as SHO P.S. SHO, Police Station D-Division, Amritsar now posted as SHO P.S. Division, Amritsar now posted as SHO P.S. SHO, Police Station D today in Court, the same is Ranjit Avenue, Amritsar City has been filed today in Court, the same is Ranjit Avenue, Amritsar City has been filed Ranjit Avenue, Amritsar City has been filed taken on record. taken on record. In view of the reply filed, learned counsel for the petitioners In view of the reply filed, learned counsel for the petitioners In view of the reply filed, learned counsel for the petitioners In view of the reply filed, learned counsel for the petitioners wishes to withdraw the present petition. wishes to withdraw the present petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. Dismissed as withdrawn. Rule discharged. Rule discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand dispose Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand dispose
08.08.2024 Tejwinder Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No TEJWINDER SINGH 2024.08.09 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; Constitution of India — art. 215.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 08 Aug 2024. The bench was HARKESH MANUJA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.