Nathu Ram v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr. Surinder Singh Siao, Advocate for the petitioner. Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral) This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 3(1)(d) of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988, seeking release on parole by the petitioner. It is on record that after conviction the petitioner has not undergone one year of sentence and furthermore the ground on the basis of which parole is sought for, is not sufficient to give relief to him. Wife of the petitioner is available to get the children admitted in the school. Dismissed. April 26, 2012 “DK” (Jasbir Singh) Judge (Sabina) Judge
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988 — s. 3(1)(d).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 26 Apr 2012. The bench was JASBIR SINGH, SABINA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.