✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 08 Jul 2008

Ramesh Kumar Jain v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly

Judgment

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr. Vikas Mehsempuri, Advocate, for the petitioner Ms.Charu Tuli, Sr. Deputy Advocate General, Punjab M.M.KUMAR, J. The instant petition is directed against order dated

11.9.2007 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Patiala Division, Patiala upholding the order of the Collector dated

3.4.2006 (Annexure P-2). The petitioner has purchased the properties from New Mandi Township, Punjab on 3.7.1984. However, he got executed transfer deed for transferring the property to his name on 10.12.2003. The District Collector, Sangrur expressed the view that the petitioners has to pay stamp duty at the market value of the property whereas he has placed reliance on the letter dated 22.10.2002 which prescribed the value of the plot as Rs. 6,92,500/- at the rate of Rs. 2500/- per square yard. Ms. Charu Tuli, learned Senior Deputy Advocate General, C.W.P.No.797 of 2008 -2- Punjab, at the outset states that the order passed by the Collector as also upheld by the Commissioner cannot be sustained as there is lack of evidence to support the findings and as to how the market value has been assessed. Therefore, she states that the impugned orders be quashed by remanding back the case to the Collector for determination afresh in accordance with law. In view of the above, the writ is allowed, the impugned order dated 3.4.2006 (Annexure P-2) passed by the Collector and the order dated 11.9.2007 passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Patiala Division, Patiala (Annexure P-4) are set aside. Parties through their counsel are directed to appear before the District Collector, Sangur, on 22.7.2008. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (M.M.KUMAR) JUDGE (SABINA) JUDGE July 08, 2008 paramjit

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is disposed of accordingly

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 08 Jul 2008. The bench was M M KUMAR, SABINA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. RAMESH KUMAR JAIN C.W.P No. 797 of 2008). ← Search more judgments