Birbal & Anr. v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Petition stands disposed of accordingly
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Operative part
Present: Mr.Nirmal Singh, Asstt. District Attorney, State of Haryana. ASI Rishipal. Detenue Mamta in person. **** SABINA, J. Petitioners have filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus for release of detenue Mamta from the custody of respondents No. 4 to 6. Detenue Mamta has appeared in the Court and has stated that she is residing with her in-laws. She has further stated that she has performed marriage with Virender @ Kalu of her own free will and does not want to live with her parents. In these circumstances, no further interference by this Court is called for. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (SABINA) JUDGE July 11, 2012
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition stands disposed of accordingly
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 11 Jul 2012. The bench was SABINA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.