Shakuntla Devi v. Central Bank of India
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 16 Oct 2007
- Bench
- M M KUMAR, AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M.Kumar Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Mittal Present: Mr. Deepak Arora , Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. A.P.Jagga, Advocate, for the respondent. M.M.Kumar, J. *** It is admitted position that the petitioner has already availed the remedy of filing an appeal before the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for brevity 'the Act') and the appeal is pending consideration of the Tribunal. The petitioner would be at liberty to file appropriate application, in case she wishes to avail some interim relief. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to pursue her remedy before the Tribunal. ( M.M.KUMAR ) JUDGE (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE October 16, 2007
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 16 Oct 2007. The bench was M M KUMAR, AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.