BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 3689/2007 (Sheikh Amir Kalumiyan v. Parmatma Ek Sevak Sahakari Nagrik Bank Limited, thro. its Manager ) & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 31 Jan 2008
- Bench
- D D SINHA, VASANTI A NAIK
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr. Khan, counsel for the petitioner Mr. Ghare, counsel for the R-1. CORAM : D.D.SINHA AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 31, 2008. Heard. Mr. Ghare, the learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 states that the respondents are withdrawing the impugned notices dated 26.07.2006,
01.08.2006 and 16.12.2006 issued under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 with liberty to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with the provisions and rules applicable in this behalf. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent no.1, cause of action in the present writ petition comes to an end. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE APTE JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 31 Jan 2008. The bench was D D SINHA, VASANTI A NAIK.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.