RakshaRani HSAMB & Ors. v. NONE

41n view oft he aforesaiddiscussionwe allow t his writ and direcl t he t o providewat cr supplyand sewerage facilit ies and rot hr facilit iesas m ent ionedin t he sanct ionedbuildingplans t o all Sahil Soni t he 2016.03.21 12:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 4m wr Pooja 2014.04.09 13:22 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh 1 1 1 425 f j 1 1 1 1 I l 1 C 0 0 CD I r e Z t r r 08 1 J 1 m m o Z Qe CWP of2003 ot her connect edm at t ers 11 plotholders ln t heNew Grain Market NaneolaDist rict 4m balawit hin a periodof one year I tis furt herdirect ed 47 t hatt he int erest fromt he would not int erest d penal t ill t he wat er and sewerage facilit ies are t o t hemin t he New Grain Markct I t isalso t hat t he pct it ionerswill t he allot t edplot sas wit hin a periodof t wo years from t he dat e of providingoft he wat erand seweragefacilit lesin t he Ncw Grain Market H0wever t lle t he m elwhile 111 t o pay inst alm ent soft he price already wouldcom e fixedwit hout int erest The clause of int crest int o aft erfacilit ies of wat cr supplyand sewerageare t o t hd pet it lonerslll t he new Grain Market I f t he com m itany default 111 aforesaidm anner t he said default paym entof inst alm ent s in t hc t heywill be liable t o pay int erest Oll lot m ent let t er in t he What ever have fallen due t ill t oday t hc 1 shallpay t he sam e t o t he wit hina d 1 of t wo m ont hs I f any new defaultin t he paym enl inst alm ent sis t l liable t o payint erestalso 33 t he would bc Anot her Bench in t he case of Mls Fat eh SinghJit ender Kum ar vse St at e of Haryana and ot hers 2000 31PLR 2 t he earlier Division Bench j udglnentin t he case of Mls Makhan Pooja 2014.04.09 13:22 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh 9 r eI W A Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 426 I t 14 CWPNo1122 Of2003 ot herconnect edm at t ers 11 J J 12 and ot her in t hc Lal DalipSingh caseof SinghKang v 1999 PLJ Jl 219DBI whereinit hasbeenheld as underl 11 The roads I 6 and I e7 relied upon by m Q1r 0 0 C r Z l J 1 02j 0 1 Z t l ShriHooda do not in anym anner supportt hCcase set Ull by t he A careful lhe order 111 NkhanLal DalipSinghandot hersv St at eand ot hers6suprashowst hat DalipSinghhad com e lvllsMakhan Lal wit h t he pleat hatit coulcl st artconst ruct iondUe t O lackof wat er and seweragc and also because t he elect ric wires werc t he plot The for lI lC realisat iont hat it was eralse const ruct ionbecause seem s t o have on a for t hel I pn t o of lhe exist ence of elect ric overt hePlOtagreedt o t he ofcondit ion byt he court t hal int erestshallnot be on t loc am ountof inst alm ent s Theorder passedin CWP No10948of 1993 is a reit erat ionof t he direct ion givenin Mls Makhan Lal DalipSinghs supraI hepet it ioner111OUT consideredview cannot t ake I of t hose orders becauseas r his own l showingt he has been have been m ade 1 availablet o it e Pooja 2014.04.09 13:22 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh A Single oft his Court in t he case of Vinod Mit t al and ot hers Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 I l t 4 1 1 1 1 i r 1 6 1 1 1 427 1 1 rt P CWP of2003 8c ot her connect edm at t ers 13 1 vse St at e f Haryana 8c Ors sim ilarissue in t his cont ext and various 200911RCR Civill 5281 considering of HUDA held as underl 1 4 1 1 1 t r 0 C0 0 C Z 0 1 Ol t V Z Qm 1 1 m 1 Pooja 2014.04.09 13:22 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh 1 1 161 On a t o have been readingof of t he HluDAAct and t he t hat t he basic am enit ies can t he relevant be said when t he inet aledroads wholesom e wat er sewerageandelect rificat ion1S and lnadeavailablet o t he allot t ees The am enit act ivit ies which includes and play fields et c lS a wider like t he t ourist spot sopen space parks Thought he expresslOll work hasnot been definedunder t he HuI oAAct or hOWeVer fO t he lim it edpurpose of enablingan allot t ee t o ut ilizet he aot t ed sit e it would includet he basic am enit iesonlyand not t he arnenit ieswhich are t o t he ent iret ownshipand need not only The be conflned t o one urban area t he t r r obligat iont o t he posseSSlOO is offered t hus under a t he basic arnenit iesalld works before t he 117J Silnilarlylhe liabilit yof an t hebalance int ereston fromt he dat eof offerof t urn lllot t ee t o pay allot lnentpriceshallaccrue onlywhich in 1 1 can be offered only on I t rneanst hat works consist ingof basic unlesst he am enit ies t he cannot chargeint erestfroln 1heallot t ee The t hat t he raisedon behalf of t he basic am enit les is not a bilat erally for charginglnt erestfrom t he and m erit S aot t eeis t hus t ot ally I n view of t he above referredprovisions t he laid down by t he t he lm pOS111g st at ut ory obligat ions upon Honble Suprem eCourt UeTe SinghSz Orse 20096lSCC 660 also do not com e t ot he The HUDA ls a Adm inist rat ion v Am arj eet recent decision in rescue of t he aut horit y const it ut ed t o a ext endedhand of t he welfare St at e I t has st rict lylI l accordancewit h it s own Sincet he local com m issionerhas found as a m at t er t he of fact t hat t he Ue Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document rlllw49 4rn e wl 428 P CWP 1 1 I l 1 140 basicam enit icsWCre haveno hesit at lOnlll are liable t opay t hat t he pet it io 02 1 t erestwit h effect from l61992 in June not priort heret oeI l LearnedSingleJudgeln case of Pawan Kum ar vse St at eof j l 1 1 I m Q 0 0 C5 4 Z I l m t r 08 00 Z Om 1 1 r r J 1 e 1 1 1 Haryanaand CWP No8129 of2008 decidedOI l 1252009while t he of t he allot t eeof t he Com m it t eeobservedas 1 1 underl b11n I n t his view oft hc m at t er t herecan beno escapebut t o default edin paym entof holdt hat t he pet it ioner clue inst allm ent sas have right lyheld it pert he agreedSchcdule t he pay penaland t erm sand condit ions liablet o of t he allot m ent and no for t he refundt hereof canbe issued The writpet it ionis Anot herSingleBench asBir SinghNain and Board Haryana oft his Court in a bunchof 1 t it led and ot hersCWP of 2008 and The t he Board t hat basic am enit ieswere providedat t het im e of allot m ent is by t he Under t he writ pet it lont his Court will not 1 t his issue Sincet he m at t er has alreadybeen decidedby a SilgleJudgeof in Mls t his Court relyingupon I nvest m ent sCase 6supral haveright lypaidt he penalint erestTherefore Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document t o any refund for m aking are not 4119 9W Ve FAVMI W 3PSK TwL Pooja 2014.04.09 13:22 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh f 9 1 J 1 1 1 429 1 J 1 0 0 1 Ca5 1 C49 I r 1 1 1 A Z 4 Q C 02j Oo a Z Cle m e CWPNo1122 of2003 O ot her connect edm at t ers 15 of ext ensionfee andpenalint erest 79 While sim ilar issue Honble Suprem eCourt in t he case 1 of UT Adm inist rat ion 0 Anre Vse Am arj eetSingh Orse JT 2009 4 SC 39 relied upon it s earlier j udgm ent111 t he case 6f Municipal Lt d 2006 4 SCC 109 and various ot her Chandigarhv Shant ikunjI nvest m ent s Pvt e aS and observed underl 183 As per t he t erins of allot m ent upon t he 75 per cent of m anner t he 1 e Over t he 2oer andrest of t o be paidin a handed leasedalnount int erestat t he rat e of 10per cent t o t hree annual t he whole of inst allm ent salollgwit h I f som eone want s t he t he 75 per cent of I n t hat ase he will am ount hecan do so not be t o pay any int erest But ifoart y want s t o nke paym entwit hin a periodof t hreeyears t heh he is under t he obligat iont o pay 10 per cent lnt erest on t healnount of inst allinelnt This is t he t he allot t ee as per t he obligat ionon t hepart of condit ionof leasc and he cannot gct out ofit by sayingt hat t he basic am enit ies halle not been for enjoyingt he allot t ed land t herefore liable t o pay t he int et est he is not We askedt he I earnedcounsel for t he part iest o t ell US which is t he oft he lessor in t he lease deed whichsays t hat t hey ill not chargelnt erest t he am enlt les on t he inst alhnent sbefore There is neit herany ondit ion ln t he lease nor any t he part ieshave t heir eyeswide open t hey givent heir bids have t o blaine t hem selvesI t cannot be enforcd by any m anclam usas cont ained lrl not lce I l 1 t here is no obligat ion 111 t he auct ionea under t he auct ion I f t he leasc deed or Therefore biddercanllot seek of prelniumor int erestpayableas per rules 95 it is cvident t hat a lesseelsuccessful of t he inst alm ent s t he of accrual of 04 Pooja 1 2014.04.09 13:22 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh llOt in a posit iont o accept t he 20We are subm issionof Shri Bhandaret hat equit ywould not delnandchargingof int erest even t hought he plot s Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 1 1 430 18 y t CwP No1122 of2003 ot her connecled m at t ers 16 1 yett o be fully developedWhen part iesent er int o cont ract t heyare t o abideby t he t erm s and condit ionsof unl6ss t he sam t he sam e I n t he presentcase of eqdit y does not really anse relat ingt o int erest is founded on viresofwhich hasnot been inasm uchas t he condit ion I l 1 C 0 0 CD r Z v 0 C45 C12 1 sm v Z Cle t his case in Decem ber 1996 24 But t he fact s of different The auct ion sale was The Nat ional Com m ission has recorded a finding t hat ealm osl all t hefacilit ieslam enit ieshad provided lI l t he year 1999 t hat is wit hin about t wo years Thereforet he observat ionsof t his court in para38 t o t hese will have no whereas we as t heywere m adein t he cont ext are concerned of a writ wit h a under Consum er Prot ect ion Act We m ay also refer t o anot heraspect Sect ion7 of t he Act em powerst he Cent ral Governm entt o levysuch fees and t axes it m ay consider necessary which shall be in addit ion t o any fee or t ax for t het ilne beingleviable underanyot herlaw respectof any sit e or buildingon t he t ransferee t he occupiert hereof providinglnaint ainingor cont inuingany am enlt y This provisionclearlydelnonst rat es t hat auct loll of plot son paidis not levyingfees Governm ent is lease basis and t he prem iuin any am enit yThe Cent ral t o provideam elllt les by and t axes inespectof sit eslplot sOll 1S t he providingam enit les is not t he t ransfereesloccupierst hereof Therefore it doubt ful whet her any t he purpose of linked t o reduct ion in int erestcould be m ade on t he ground of am enit iesrBe t hat as it m ay As we halI e alreadyheld t hat para 38 wlll not eapplywe do not proposeexam lne t hat aspectany furt herin t hesecases 95 1 Even t houghDilision Bench of t his Court 10 t he case of Pankaj Sharm a and ot hers supralruled t hat liabilit yt o pay int erestand penalt y 1 accrues on com plet ionof facilit ies However a Division Bench lI l t he case of Mls Fat eh SinghJit ender Kum ar upralhad expresseda different opinionregardingt he liabilit yt o pay int erestand penalipt erest111 t he event of default The cont roversy has been now set t led at Pooja 2014.04.09 13:22 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh rest by Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document I 2 1 1 et 1 I l 1 1 I l 1 1 r Z r V01 431 I r t 47 CWP of2003 ot her connect edm at t ers I l C 17 Honble Suprem eCourt t he case of Municipal Corporat ioil Chandigarhsupralwherein it has been held t hat unless t here is any t he aut horit ies t o provideam enit ies and t he t hepart of obligat ionOll of inst alm ent shas wit h t he am enit iest o be 7 t he allot t eeis not of it s liabilit yt o pay int erest and penalint cresl t heevent of default nor such a successfulbiddcr can seckrescheduling b of t he inst alm ent sof prem iumor of accrual of int erest 1 Q 0 0 as per ruleslcont ract 5 and 60f t he allot m entlet t erim posean obligat ionupon t he allot t eet o pay t he inst alm ent sas pert he schedule and in t lle r1 I l 1 11 1 2 1 0 I llt4 j V 61 711 r 1 CD eventof default t o payt he penalt y The st at ut oryrUleswere fram edin t hc year2000againim posinga liabilit yt o pay int ereston inst alm cnt sfrom t llc dat e inst alm ent is dueas is evident from Rule 4 659 Rule 5 furt her providest hat possessionshallbe offered t o t he allot t eewit hin 30 daysfrolll t he dat e of issue of allot m ent let t er Minim um basicfacilit ics like roads wat ersupplyelct riflcat ion et c are exist ingand if t hesebasic facilit ies are 1 Z 1 t r t Z 06 r0 m m o Z t hen aft er providingt he said basic facilit ies These rules t hus st at ut oryprot ect iont o t he allot t eesagainstt he paym entof int erest t l 4e from t hedat eof offer of and t he is t o be deliveredon t he basic facilit ies These st at ut oryprovisionshave furt her been am endedon532002 which furt her t he posit ionThese rulesarc in nat ure andcannot be applied Thus t he legal posit ionwhich em erges is as underl t 1 1 1 All cases of allot m ent prior t o fram ingof st at uloryrules dalcd 1032000shall be governedbyt hc cont ract Undcr t he cot cl t hcrc f 4 7 151 I l I ll 2 f 1n1 1 bI l 8 10 1 11 I l 1 1 r I l lS no condit ionor covenant Pooja 2014.04.09 13:22 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh t hat t he liabil it y lo pay int erest pelolal Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document beL v 2a011 N r l AO 1 1 l l m 1 C 0 C 1 CD Z 0 4 Ol 1 1 7 Z Om n 1 r 1 J 1r 1 1 r CWP of2003 c ot her connect edm at t ers 18 int erest shallbe P1 Such l oft heallot t eeswho were allot t edplot spriort o 1032000are liable t o pay int erestand penalt y111 wit h t he t erm s and condit ions oft heallot m entlet t er 29Such ofhe who were allot t edplot saft er 2000 are liable t o payint erest and penalint erest fromt he dat e offer of possession was m ade The possessionlS t o beoffered from t he dat e f basic facilit ieslike roads wat er elect rificat ionare m adeavailable Thus t he t o pay int erest Under t he st at ut oryprovlsions becom es payablefromt he dat e basic facilit ie are is offered 3 I n so far as t he liabilit yt o pay ext enslOn feeis concernedat t he lm C of allot m ent of plot s111 t heyear 1988 t herewas no provisioneit hcr 111 t hecont ract or any st at ut oryprovisionfor paym entof ext ensioll fee for t hefirst t ilne cam e t o be int roducedvide policy dat ed 29 1998 and t hus t he ext ension fee becom es payable onlyin respectof plot swhere const ruct ionhas not been carried out lI l wit h t he t erm s and condit ions of aforcv r dat ed29A998 These pet it ionsare disposedof in t erm s of t he abovc direct ions 6 1202010 MFK 1 1 4 PERMOD KOHLI I JUDGE Not e2Wheht er t o bc referred t o Report eror not 2I NO Pooja 2014.04.09 13:22 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh 1r 11 ee I l 061 Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document