✦ Karnataka High Court

(BY SRI. SANMATHI E I & Anr. v. KARNATAKA URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE - 3 - NC: -DB ITA No. 498

Income Tax Appeal No. 498 of 2022KRISHNA S DIXIT, G BASAVARAJA

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

(BY SRI. SANMATHI E I., ADVOCATE AND SRI. DILIP M., ADVOCATE) AND: M/S KARNATAKA STATE POLICE HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., (KSPHC) NO.59, RICHMOND ROAD, BENGALURU-560 025. PAN:[REDACTED], (BY SRI. ASHOK A KULAKARNI.,ADVOCATE) …RESPONDENT THIS ITA/INCOME TAX APPEAL UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 25/11/2021 PASSED IN ITA NO.1349/BANG/2019, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-2015, PRAYING TO (1) DECIDE THE VANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2113-DB ITA No. 498 of 2022 FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND / OR SUCH OTHER QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY THE HONBLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT AND (2) SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 25/11/2021 PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘A’ BENCH, BENGALURU, AS SOUGHT FOR, IN THE RESPONDENT-ASSESSEE’S CASE, IN APPEAL PROCEEDINGS NO. ITA NO.1349/BANG/2019 (ANNEXURE-A) FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-2015 AND GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF AS DEEMED FIT, INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS ITA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA ORAL JUDGEMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT) Substantially the fact matrix of this appeal matches with that of the earlier order of Coordinate Bench judgment in COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER vs. KARNATAKA URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2113-DB ITA No. 498 of 2022 DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCE CORPORATION, (2006) 203 CTR 0422. In view of that, the appeal is liable to be dismissed & accordingly it is, costs having been made easy. Sd/- (KRISHNA S DIXIT) JUDGE Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE List No.: 2 Sl No.: 0

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Income Tax Appeal No. 498 of 2022). ← Search more judgments