Aseem @ Molu v. The State of Haryana & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 19 Nov 2012
- Bench
- RAM CHAND GUPTA
Outcome
Disposed of
application stands disposed of
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Ms. Sarla Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Raja Sharma, A.A.G. Haryana. ******* RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) CRM-W No.1134 of 2012. Heard. In view of the facts mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Order dated 7.11.2012 is recalled and the Crl. Misc. No.W-1084 of 2012 is ordered to be restored at its original number. Criminal misc. application stands disposed of. CRM-W No.1084 of 2012 Requests for placing on record Annexure P-1 i.e. application moved to Juvenile Justice Board. The same is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. CRWP No.2735 of 2011(O&M) -2- Criminal misc. application stands disposed of. CRWP No.2735 of 2011 The present criminal writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the release of the petitioner under Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) of Children Act, 2000 and Rules, 2007, considering the claim of petitioner to adjudge him as juvenile at the time of occurrence. Learned counsel for the petitioner requests for withdrawal of this petition at this stage. Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage. November 19, 2012. Sachin M. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) JUDGE CRWP No.2735 of 2011(O&M) -3-
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: application stands disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) of Children Act, 2000.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 19 Nov 2012. The bench was RAM CHAND GUPTA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.