Kumud Preenja v. State of Punjab & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL. Present:- Mr. M.L. Sachdeva, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Arvind Mittal, Addl. A.G., Punjab, for respondent Nos.1 to 4. Mr. Swaran Sehgal, Advocate, for respondent No.5. SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J (Oral). After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail the remedy of Civil Suit or any other remedy available under the Punjab Affiliated Colleges (Security of Service) Amendment Act, 2007. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 26th October, 2009. Monika (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Punjab Affiliated Colleges (Security of Service) Amendment Act, 2007.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 26 Oct 2009. The bench was SATISH KUMAR MITTAL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.